EVE Search - The sleeping bear awakens

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

The sleeping bear awakens

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.10 12:05:00 - [1] Originally by: Melina Octurian Originally by: Lykouleon This will be dealt with. Spoken like a true cloaky pet. we won't be busy in querious ~forever~ see you soon sweetpea x x ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.10 22:09:00 - [2] Originally by: Hexentanz http://www.paxton-federation.info/killboard/?a=kill_related&kll_id=53736 http://www.ushrakhan.com/alliance/edk/?a=kill_related&kll_id=95720 (same engagement from UK perspective) lesson learnt: single alliance killboards in a battle involving over a dozen alliances give a terrible representation of the fight ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.10 22:32:00 - [3] Edited by: Butter Dog on 10/01/2010 22:33:10 Originally by: Lilan Kahn Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Hexentanz http://www.paxton-federation.info/killboard/?a=kill_related&kll_id=53736 http://www.ushrakhan.com/alliance/edk/?a=kill_related&kll_id=95720 (same engagement from UK perspective) lesson learnt: single alliance killboards in a battle involving over a dozen alliances give a terrible representation of the fight sure you mean http://kb.wedie.co.uk/?a=kill_related&kll_id=22862 VICTORY for ~eLiTe PvP~ but these guys did even better... amazing http://killboard.systematic-chaos.eu/?a=kill_related&kll_id=56437 ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 07:27:00 - [4] Originally by: Wildcard Trek Originally by: Lord Makk Edited by: Lord Makk on 10/01/2010 23:19:33 Don't poke HED with the stick anymore, it'll be taken from your hands, cracked in two and shoved up ur behinds. We have no interest in HED terrorist scum, we enjoy our neighbors, we respect AAA, they bring good fights with no smack and they actually show up to fight and not cloak, gank, and run at the first sign of resistance. We poke HED just like they in return poke QBL and D-G, one day UK might learn from them, maybe... well one can hope. I always bring 500 to fight 200 when looking for ~goodfights~ (translation: grabbing territory) its a well known fact you're padding your fleets with hundreds of useless battlecruisers from holder alliances, simply to create lag and any negate any chance of a ~goodfight~ so please drop the neighbourly crap - we've all seen the chatlogs its a valid tactic, sheer numbers can work in Dominion, but we can blob too ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 11:32:00 - [5] Originally by: Ltd SpacePig Well strange.. those battlecruisers kicked ur ass in both F9E and SV5.. Not so useless after all i guess if by 'kicked ur ass' you mean you lost all your battleships (and a few carriers), didn't kill very much, and allowed us to hold the field then reinforced the ihub... then yeah, you kicked it basically the battlecruisers were useless but worked from a lag-generation perspective, however when you lost your useful ships (fleet bs) you had to abandon the fight ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 11:56:00 - [6] Edited by: Butter Dog on 11/01/2010 11:56:23 Originally by: ScutterOne You obviously missed the first 2 engagements and only arrived with the final AAA blob. If you mean the first two enagements where it was 600 v 200, then I was there, and kills/losses were about even, and not very great (although we had much fewer ships to lose). We broke off and called for more numbers. When we got more numbers, we re-engaged and you lost rather horribly. Thats probably because, even though you were still numerically superior, you literally had about 300 crappy BC's padding your fleet ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 12:52:00 - [7] Originally by: ScutterOne Your interpretation of the first 2 engagements is intersting (and of course wrong - except the bit about how you ran away and called for more numbers). Of course it is true that BC don't put out the same DPS as a BS - but they did give more mobile options and allowed us to get right into your sniper fleet and wipe it out. One thing I will admit to is that with such a large engagement, and with so much lag it is quite possible - even likely that there are many interpretations of events that occured, and they all have some merit. dear god, are you really this clueless cross check all the killboards, we barely lost anything in F9E (partly thanks to lag), but were massively outnumbered so regrouped in SV5 and batphoned some friends Then, in the main engagement where most kills happened, we reengaged on the ihub in SV5 where you warped in at 0 and died horribly to our BS fleets. You had the numerical advantage, but you lost pretty much all your battleships and your FC called a retreat Face facts - your 300 battlecruisers were useless when up against a fleet comprising mostly of battleships, and the results of the main engagement in Sv5 speaks for itself. Of course, CVA has a more realistic viewpoint on the matter: Originally by: Guderian3 on scrapheap we are dead, -a- holds the field. All those crappy BC's simply padded out the numbers, but once all your BS died your FC knew it was over and called a retreat. But do feel free to carry on about how amazing your 300 BC's are, it makes you look like quite the master strategist ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 16:40:00 - [8] Originally by: Executus Primus Originally by: Mirmenel I must say I'm rather sad that the Proviblob felt compelled to pick a side in the fight between -A- & Co. and Goons, since deliberately or not, that is essentially what they have done by taking -A- space outside Prov just as the 49-U thing kicked off. As far as i know the space was unclaimed. So if -A- wants that space they probably should have set up a TCU. You haven't heard of AAA Citizens? It's space to be rented, and its not yours ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 19:58:00 - [9] Originally by: Dawn Rider who ever is fighting Ushra'Khan kerbstomp them please hey, don't be angry our 'other' masters, ATLAS, are taking your high-ends and stations... we pleaded with them not to! ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 20:04:00 - [10] Originally by: Wildcard Trek The CVA, and Holders are not out to conquer AAA, we just want to use some of the space they have seemingly left unclaimed, and if it leads to good fights with a respected neighbor then so be it. I'm curious, did you ask them if they were using the space? Did you know if they had it earmarked for renters? Or did you just assume and hope for the best? Once again your arrogance is as breathtaking as your short-sightedness. I'd would expect nothing more from a filthy slaver. /endrp ps - do you understand what the word 'reclaimed' means? It signifies you held the space before - you didn't, AAA have controlled that pipe since their formation as an alliance ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.11 20:52:00 - [11] Originally by: Taradis Bitter Dog is bitter. Those systems were unclaimed no sov thus meaning no1 has claimed them. Either way gf to all and let their be many more I think the answer you are looking for is "no, I didn't know if they were earmarked for renting, or if AAA wanted them, we just assumed they were free, and now we're going to lose our ihubs " ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.12 09:00:00 - [12] ~goodfights~ were had in WD last night well, at least until our snipers were fleetwarped to 0 into your BC blob somehow i lived, thank you for sparing me ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.12 15:56:00 - [13] Originally by: ScutterOne Originally by: Butter Dog ~goodfights~ were had in WD last night well, at least until our snipers were fleetwarped to 0 into your BC blob somehow i lived, thank you for sparing me ..what BC - surely not ..now where is that told ya so tee shirt they only work when the numbers are overwhemling, to be fair... today in F9E/SV5 numbers were even, but your BC's performed 'less than optimally' you may as well zerg the system with 500 T1 cruisers... the effect would be the same, total lag hell death ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2010.01.14 16:57:00 - [14] Originally by: Ice Fist I have to say, at the rate your going (you're now on your fourth set of SBUs) its going to take you at least another week just to take 49-u, and thats it everything goes perfect for you. Yeah, you won't be in NOL anytime soon unless you drop whatever you're doing in 49- and go straight there. You're right, we clearly need some help to make real progress. If only there were a 4000 man alliance available who had just finished cleaning out your pets in Fountain... o wait ---------- ~bitter dog~ etc

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.